With its 55 different bookable spaces hosting more than 2,000 non-cricketing events a year, there was no more fitting location to assess the vast disparity in county cricket’s finances than The Oval on a resplendent, sun-drenched morning this week.
The fortune of its expansive South London real estate provides Surrey an unassailable advantage in the battle between English cricket’s 18 Victorian-age institutions grappling to remain solvent in a troublesome modern era.
Looking for a distinctive venue in the capital to host a team-building activity? The Oval.
Keen to find a wedding location for a cricket-loving spouse? The Oval.
Launching a new finance report warning of the “yawning gap” between the rich and poor of cricket’s domestic game? There can only be one place.
“If I was the rest [of the counties],” said former England captain Michael Vaughan, sitting on a top-table panel inside The Oval’s John Major Room, “I would be looking at Surrey.”
Rocket science, it is not.
Bountiful in cash and trophies, Surrey have long been the county others love to hate; the Manchester United (in the 1990s and 2000s) or Manchester City (ever since) of the domestic cricket world.
Here, in black and white, was the reason why. The inaugural Leonard Curtis Cricket Finance Report highlighted some stark figures, none more so than the £65.39 million revenue Surrey made in 2023.
Not only was that more than seven times what 11 counties brought in, but it was close to double the other occupants of what the report termed English cricket’s financial ‘big three’ in Lancashire (£36.46million) and Warwickshire (£32.79million).
In such a context, it is little wonder the south Londoners are currently eyeing a fourth successive County Championship title.
Through analysing a decade’s worth of economic data and sorting performances, the experts and academics behind the report ranked all 18 counties in a “financial performance index”.
To no one’s surprise, it was Surrey who came out on top by some margin, followed by Hampshire, Nottinghamshire, Warwickshire and Lancashire – all clubs that host men’s internationals and The Hundred.
At the other end of the scale were Leicestershire, Derbyshire, Middlesex, Kent, Worcestershire and Northamptonshire – counties benefiting from neither of those things (Middlesex are mere tenants of Marylebone Cricket Club at Lord’s).
Yes, The Hundred; the competition creating a gaping chasm between English cricket’s rich and poor, while simultaneously providing a lifeline for the game’s future.
Over the course of an hour’s presentation, the report’s panel – which included Vaughan, the writer of the foreword – described the incoming £520 million windfall from the sale of equity in The Hundred’s eight franchises as a magic pill for clubs on the brink. Each non-host county is expected to bank about £25 million, with hosts maintaining the capacity to generate far more.
“An unprecedented chance to repurpose county cricket,” said one expert. “An amazing opportunity, especially for the counties at the bottom, to build a sustainable future,” suggested another.
“A great opportunity for the game to keep an 18-county system,” said a third.
It all sounds hugely positive, especially for the likes of Northamptonshire (71%), Leicestershire (67%) and Derbyshire (56%), all of whom currently receive the majority of their income from the England and Wales Cricket Board’s central funding pot (which, by contrast, makes up just 6% at Surrey).
One of the report’s authors suggested a number of counties would simply be lost without the cash injection.
But the money comes with a warning. Last year, corporate restructuring firm Leonard Curtis began its delve into the business of sport with a similar report into English rugby union, declaring that seven of the 10 Gallagher Premiership clubs were insolvent on the balance sheet.
In fact, 13 top rugby clubs had received about £13.5million each only five years earlier when private equity firm CVC Capital Partners bought a 27% stake in the sport’s top flight.
But, without guardrails on what that money could be spent on it was quickly frittered away, failing to prevent the demise of Wasps, Worcester Warriors and London Irish in just nine months.
In a bid to avoid a similar fate befalling its counties, the ECB intends to be strong custodians of The Hundred money, only releasing it for such purposes as debt repayment, facility redevelopment and player pathway improvement.
“This chance may not come around again,” said Vaughan.
“It would be a huge mistake for this just to go on player wages. Clubs must be strong because after this sudden influx of money, I would expect pressure from players and agents for higher salaries.
“The new windfall for county cricket is so important and must not be allowed to go to waste.”
The likelihood is there were five other non-cricketing events held at The Oval on the day the report was launched in a room decked with photos of Surrey greats.
Another half-dozen would follow the next day, and the next.
Over the coming six weeks, the ground will host a sold-out England v India Test match ahead of a packed season of The Hundred.
It is not possible to compete; that would be an unattainable mission.
The challenge for most counties is long-term survival.
Photograph by Gareth Copley/Getty Images